The so-called ‘Starhymn' of Ignatius' epistle to the Ephesians 19:1-3
has garnered a great deal of scholarly attention. Its ambiguous
wording and seemingly out-of-place Docetic flavor provide fertile
grounds for debate. Indeed, articulating the precise Christological
ideology from which the Starhymn emerged monopolizes most of treatments
of the text, eliding discussions of theological significance altogether.
Scholars such as and Heinrich Schlier and Hans Werner Bartsch see a
Gnostic Hintergrund for the Starhymn. Others, such as William Schoedel,
have looked to the miraculous birth narratives of Christ and
apocalyptic Jewish texts in their search for a background. Despite the
fruitful contribution of both schools' analyses to the study of the
Ignatian epistles, their dependence upon compartmentalization (of both
the Starhymn and the traditions which underlie it) obscures its function
within Ignatius' polemic. In this paper, I aim to modify these
schools' positions, and by doing so, re-contextualize Ignatius within
his own syncretistic religious milieu. Doing so foregrounds his
re-appropriation an already-existing hymn that is coded with Docetic
language. He then deploys this language against Docetists. By doing
so, Ignatius accomplishes a re-coding of this hymn for a proto-orthodox
audience. As such, his Docetist opponents may appeal to similar
astrological language to legitimate their Christology, but according to
the bishop, they have miscalculated. It is Ignatius and the
proto-orthodoxy who have interpreted the Christ event correctly.
No comments:
Post a Comment