One of the most enduring religious conflicts of the late-antique period
was that occasioned by the Council of Chalcedon (451 CE). The person who
galvanised the anti-Chalcedonian side theologically and politically was
Severus, patriarch of Antioch from 512-518. During his lifetime he
engaged vigorously in debate with his theological rivals, being
eventually exiled in 518 and condemned by imperial edict in 538. The
odium that attached to his person and works continued after his death,
as can be seen, for example, from the numerous references to him and his
works in imperial documents and conciliar acta. However, two sustained post-mortem
attacks on the patriarch of a non-theological nature stand out: a long
letter by the otherwise unknown monk Eustathius from the mid-sixth
century (CPG 6810), and the polemical poem by George of Pisidia (CPG
7836), which dates from between 619 and 634. This paper will investigate
the rhetoric employed by these two authors and their hostile
representation of the pre-eminent opponent of the council of 451 and his
followers, in which negotiation and conflict-resolution did not play a
part and damnatio memoriae was paramount.
No comments:
Post a Comment