In this paper I examine various categories of finds from a recent
archaeological investigation at the Monastery of St. Anthony in Egypt.
These finds have yielded new insight into the life of the early monastic
community, the spatial development of the Monastery, and the
Monastery’s trade relations with the outside world. The paper treats
issues such as chronology, self-sufficiency/local specialization, and
fluctuations within the trade relations of the Monastery.
Showing posts with label Church History. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Church History. Show all posts
Friday, 8 May 2015
Robin Jensen: Representations of Teachers and Disciples on Third and Fourth-Century Roman SarcophagiRepresentations of Teachers and Disciples on Third and Fourth-Century Roman Sarcophagi
The depiction of a man reading from a scroll and accompanied by a “muse”
or a teacher among his disciples was a familiar figure on third-century
Roman sarcophagi. Commonly categorized under the general heading of
“philosopher sarcophagi,” art historians often describe these as
signifying a growing interest in representing the deceased as an
idealized, cultured intellectual. The central figure – the learned man –
was usually depicted wearing a tunic and pallium, as well as the
beard, commonly associated with portraits of philosophers. A version of
this figure appears regularly on later, Christian sarcophagi, sometimes
transformed into a depiction of Christ among his apostles, but
occasionally as part of compositions dominated by episodes from
scripture or joined by the good shepherd or female orant. In addition,
standing figures holding scrolls appear are incorporated into certain
biblical narratives, including the scene of John baptizing Jesus. This
paper will briefly review standard art historical interpretations of the
“philosopher” type on non-Christian sarcophagi, and then explore the
possible significance of its adaptation on Christian monuments from the
late third through the mid fourth century, in particular proposing that
the image no longer alludes primarily to the virtues of the secular,
intellectual life, but rather that it presents Christianity as
alternative paideia in which the evangelist is the teacher and knowledge is as much a matter of witness as it is of cultivated reading.
Aza Goudriaan: Nicaea: Origin of the Decline of Christianity? Early Modern anti-Trinitarian Historiography and the Protestant Response
Early modern anti-trinitarians, such as Michael Servet and Christian
Francken, criticized the Council of Nicaea (325) for having introduced
Trinitarian dogma and, therefore, initiated the decay of Christianity.
In this perspective, pre-Nicene theology provided a cradle and
confirmation for anti-trinitarian theology. This theological
historiography and its rebuttal by Protestants such as Franciscus Junius
and Amandus Polanus involved the construction of competing patristic
arguments. Several of these arguments are analyzed in this paper.
Camille Gerzaguet: Preaching in Northern Italy (360-450) : A Pedagogy of Faith
As far as Italy is concerned, several
collections of sermons of the IVth and Vth
centuries have been kept. Among them, the sermons of Zeno of Verona,
Gaudentius of Brescia, Chromatius of Aquileia, Maximus of Turin,
Peter Chrysologus (for Ambrose of Milan, Explanationes in XII
palmos and De sacramentis are concerned) provide a
consistent and coherent set of a geographically and culturally
bounded area. The paper shall consider the role of sermons over the
period from the 360s to the 450s in Northern Italy in a twofold
perspective. It is actually about understanding the extent to which
preaching, as a major driver of faith, served as a means of unifying
and spreading the ecclesia. It is also about analyzing how
preaching was also used to categorize individuals according to their
degree of spiritual advancement by creating some boundaries inside
the community. Becoming Christian in Late Antiquity implied to follow
a spiritual progression which could be enlighted by the study of
preaching. As rallying as splitting point, the sermon established the
place of the faithful in Church. From a liturgical point of view, I
will focus then on the lectures that were marked out for some of
these status, especially catechumeni, competentes,
neophyti (for example, the lifes of the Patriarchs were read
to the competentes in Milan), and on the exegetical discourse,
spiritual or moral, that was related to these lectures. Such an
analysis on sermons must also include a sociological approach.
Therefore, it will highlight the variety and composition of
audiences: was it really a selection that came to worship (MacMullen
1989) ? Did that make a difference preaching in a small town or
in an imperial capital ? Finally, the interactions between preachers
and audiences (adresses, questions etc.) will be analyzed from
a pastoral point view. The whole approach should help to understand
how the process of becoming Christian was anchored in a pedagogy of
faith.
Bella Image: Becoming Christian: the Roman Senate in the period up to Constantine
This paper addresses the question of ‘becoming Christian' not for an individual, but for a body: the senatorial class of Rome.
The people of Rome, and in particular the senatorial class, are often characterized in academic literature as the last bastion of traditional Roman religion. However, this may be skewed by interest in the so-called ‘pagan revival' of the late fourth century. Yet the case for senatorial disinterest in Christianity in the third century is in fact mere argument 'ex silentio' arising from the paucity of evidence. This paper therefore reviews the signs of Christianity for the period up to the reign of Constantine, and parallels this with evidence for a decline in traditional religion in the same period among the senatorial classes. It will be argued that, as an urban group, the senatorial class in Rome may have even led the way in Christianisation more than often thought.
The people of Rome, and in particular the senatorial class, are often characterized in academic literature as the last bastion of traditional Roman religion. However, this may be skewed by interest in the so-called ‘pagan revival' of the late fourth century. Yet the case for senatorial disinterest in Christianity in the third century is in fact mere argument 'ex silentio' arising from the paucity of evidence. This paper therefore reviews the signs of Christianity for the period up to the reign of Constantine, and parallels this with evidence for a decline in traditional religion in the same period among the senatorial classes. It will be argued that, as an urban group, the senatorial class in Rome may have even led the way in Christianisation more than often thought.
Bronwen Neil: Reception of Late-Antique Popes in the Middle Ages and Beyond
Leo the Great (440-61) and Gregory the Great (590-604) earned their
epithets in different ways, Leo by his intervention at the Council of
Chalcedon via one momentous letter known as the Tome (Ep. 28), and
Gregory by his spiritual direction, civic leadership, and his prolific
publication of works in various genres, some of which were taken up by
the Eastern church. This paper looks at how other late-antique popes
were received in the Middle Ages, and used to promote particular agenda.
It considers what kind of contribution to eastern-western Church
relations was required for a pope to be remembered beyond the century in
which he lived. It will be argued that successful mediation between the
Roman and Byzantine churches was a prerequisite for a lasting impact on
later ages. This impact can be measured by the continued popularity of
their works, whether in Latin or in translations into Greek and other
vernaculars. The proliferation of early and late medieval Lives of Roman
bishops also testifies to their importance throughout Europe, both in
Byzantium and the medieval West up to the Renaissance.
Thursday, 7 May 2015
Ariane Bodin: Identifying the signs of Christianness in late antique Italy and Africa
The question at stake in this paper is how to identify a Christian in
the Roman Society. It is now widely admitted that Christians cannot be
recognized through their clothes in Late Antiquity, except for those
converted to asceticism. Christians rarely revealed their identity in
texts, but we can analyse some signs likely to reveal one’s
christianness or religious conversion. First of all, there exists a
number of other outward signs that allows one to tell who is Christian.
All Romans – pagans, Jews or Christians – sought protection by wearing
phylacteries around their neck. As for the Christians, their amulets or
phylacteries are connected to the cult of the saints, since reliquary
phylacteries could serve as suspension capsules or containers for holy
relics. Christian phylacteries were by manifold aspects a threat against
relics privatization led by clerics as it has been demonstrated by
Peter Brown. But all christians cannot wear relics around their neck
either because of their cost, or because the events prevent them from
doing so. Secondly, Christian identity can be retrieved from texts and
inscriptions through visual signs, such as Christian symbols (ie cross,
Chi Rho, christogram). Onomastic change due to conversion to
Christianity are attested in the post-Constantinian period. Some new
Christians may use additional cognomen to show their faith in Christ,
such as martyrial names, theophoric names, or names proving a process of
religious change. Finally, studying the social network of Romans may
also reveal religious changes such as Christianness.
Rafal Toczko: The Shipwrecks and Philosophers: The Rhetoric of Aristocratic Conversion in the Late 4th and Early 5th Centuries
In this study the literary aspects of the conversion to Christianity
will be discussed. It has been based on the letters of Ambrose, Jerome,
Augustine, Paulinus of Nola, and Uranus. Letters were a very effective
medium of the early Christian public relations and conversion of a
member of aristocracy was always a phenomenon that ought to have been
celebrated and communicated. The form and style of communication e.g.
the metaphors used in trumpeting the new noble Christian can give us
insight not only into the art of rhetoric but also into the
epistemological ramifications, imaginary schemes that constituted
thinking of the aristocracy in times when Christian life became an
attractive choice.
The goal of this study is to present the detailed picture and systematization of the various modes in which conversion was treated as a literary theme in the correspondence of the studied period. The paper will focus on two different literary phenomena: 1. The rhetoric of persuading to conversion 2. The literary descriptions of famous aristocratic conversions. The first part will present the sophisticated rhetoric of Augustine persuading Volusianus and Licentius to become Christians. The second part will offer discussion of the symbolic language used in letters celebrating the conversion of Paulinus, Paula, Fabiola et al. I will contextualize the roots of the early Christian rhetoric of conversion and conclude with some remarks corresponding with the modern theories of metaphor that could possibly be helpful in reconstructing the thought pattern of the Roman aristocracy in the studied period.
The goal of this study is to present the detailed picture and systematization of the various modes in which conversion was treated as a literary theme in the correspondence of the studied period. The paper will focus on two different literary phenomena: 1. The rhetoric of persuading to conversion 2. The literary descriptions of famous aristocratic conversions. The first part will present the sophisticated rhetoric of Augustine persuading Volusianus and Licentius to become Christians. The second part will offer discussion of the symbolic language used in letters celebrating the conversion of Paulinus, Paula, Fabiola et al. I will contextualize the roots of the early Christian rhetoric of conversion and conclude with some remarks corresponding with the modern theories of metaphor that could possibly be helpful in reconstructing the thought pattern of the Roman aristocracy in the studied period.
Anna Zhyrkova: From Christ to Human Individual—Shaping the Conception of Individual Existence in Neochalcedonian theology
In debates over the orthodox and adequate expression of the union of
Divine and human natures, many theologians deemed it necessary to
assimilate a great quantity of both philosophical conceptions and
vocabulary. As a consequence, ontological discussions became an inherent
part of theological discourse. Once Philoponus had put forward his
Miaphysite stance as a logically correct conclusion from Cyril’s
Christological statements, it became impossible for theologians to avoid
strictly ontological considerations. The peculiarity of those
discussions was that their main purpose was to explain just one single
metaphysical case: that of Christ.
A “sui generis” case was not of much interest to pagan philosophy. Unique cases were eliminated by subjecting them to general rules. Christ’s uniqueness, however, not only had to be stressed, but also construed in humanly graspable, if imperfect, terms. This turned Christ into a paradigm for ontology, especially in the considerations of late Ancient and early Byzantine theologians. This paper examines the works of Neochalcedonian theologians, from John the Grammarian to Leontius of Byzantium, showing how their focus on Christ made ontology more concerned with particulars than with universals and turned attention from what things are like to the fact that they are. In their writings, the identity of particular beings was recognized and became a problem to explain, alongside the issues of what makes a single entity a unity—in spite of the multiplicity of its constitutive parts—and of what makes a human to be an individual unique being.
A “sui generis” case was not of much interest to pagan philosophy. Unique cases were eliminated by subjecting them to general rules. Christ’s uniqueness, however, not only had to be stressed, but also construed in humanly graspable, if imperfect, terms. This turned Christ into a paradigm for ontology, especially in the considerations of late Ancient and early Byzantine theologians. This paper examines the works of Neochalcedonian theologians, from John the Grammarian to Leontius of Byzantium, showing how their focus on Christ made ontology more concerned with particulars than with universals and turned attention from what things are like to the fact that they are. In their writings, the identity of particular beings was recognized and became a problem to explain, alongside the issues of what makes a single entity a unity—in spite of the multiplicity of its constitutive parts—and of what makes a human to be an individual unique being.
Stephen Lahey: The Divine Ideas in Prague: Philosophical Realism at Charles University at the Beginning of the Fifteenth Century
At the center of arguments between Wyclif supporters and their
opponents was the doctrine of the divine ideas. Upon these arguments
depended the realist ontology of universals ante rem that defined the
Bohemian philosophical theology that would lead to Hussitism. The most
important figure in these debates was Stanislaus of Znojmo, the master
of Jerome, Jakoubek, and Hus. In this paper, I will describe the place
of the doctrine of divine ideas in the philosophical theology Stanislaus
outlines in his two major works, De Vero et Falso and De Universalibus
Maior. I will devote a short portion to describing the historical
background, and to the eventual retraction Stanislaus made, but the
largest section of the paper will be a description of the relation of
Wyclif’s thought to Stanislaus.
Marek Jankowiak: Reading between the lines: Diplomacy and Conflict at the Sixth Ecumenical Council (680-1)
The Acts of the Sixth Ecumenical Council—that put an end to the
monothelete controversy in 680-1—have never attracted much attention of
the church historians. Unjustly so, as they offer a surprisingly rich
account of the most dramatic ecumenical council in church history. Below
the carefully edited surface of orderly sessions, one can catch
glimpses of intense diplomatic manoeuvring and of dramatic conflict that
degenerated into a civil war, the dethronement of two emperors, the
execution of several generals, and a momentous defeat with the Bulgars. I
will attempt to show how these events are related to the condemnation
of monotheletism and how the Acts have been redacted to mute conflict
and emphasise consensus and the respect of procedures. On this basis, I
will reflect on the mechanisms of theological diplomacy and unsuccessful
conflict prevention during the monothelete controversy.
Wednesday, 6 May 2015
Liuwe Westra: Creating a Theological Difference: The Myth of Two Grammatical Constructions with Latin Credo
The theological difference between ‘believing in God' and ‘believing
the Church' is presented as a real and significant one in most dogmatic
handbooks. However, this difference was only invented in the fourth
century. Latin sources show, that the Church (just as Forgiveness and
Resurrection) was originally taught the catechumens as something to
believe in the same way as they were taught to believe in the Triune
God. Thus, the fourth century appears to be an important turning point
in patristic ecclesiology.
Stuart Thomson: The Scholar’s Journey: A Christian-Philosophical Topos of Conversion
Plato’s Apology (21a-22e) see Socrates undertaking a literal and
metaphorical journey seeking wisdom. This is Plato’s aetiology of
Socrates’ distinctive style of philosophy; by the first century AD, this
narrative becomes the paradigm for a topos of philosophical conversion.
This paper will explore how early Christian apologists used this topos
as a method of literary self-construction, to legitimate both their
scriptures and their own writing to an elite educated audience.
This paper will explore the trope as a point of commonality between pagan, Christian and Jewish conceptions of identity as commitment to a community formed around shared conviction. Where the novelty of the Christian usage lies is in its application of the trope as a marker of religious, rather than intellectual, identity. This sets Christianity apart from and in competition with both pagan religious practices and the philosophical schools by applying the language of the latter to the practice of the former.
By applying a philosophical narrative to the realm of religious experience, the trope stands in tension with prevalent narrative of religious conversion. Rather than a response to a divine call (as in the Gospel narratives, or in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses), or the redirection of worship from false to true objects (as in the Pauline epistles), conversion becomes the cumulative accretion of wisdom by negation of false options. In turn, however, this allows Christian texts, both those read and those written by the apologists, to be presented as serious philosophical literature, approachable through generic frames already familiar to Greek litterateurs.
This paper will explore the trope as a point of commonality between pagan, Christian and Jewish conceptions of identity as commitment to a community formed around shared conviction. Where the novelty of the Christian usage lies is in its application of the trope as a marker of religious, rather than intellectual, identity. This sets Christianity apart from and in competition with both pagan religious practices and the philosophical schools by applying the language of the latter to the practice of the former.
By applying a philosophical narrative to the realm of religious experience, the trope stands in tension with prevalent narrative of religious conversion. Rather than a response to a divine call (as in the Gospel narratives, or in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses), or the redirection of worship from false to true objects (as in the Pauline epistles), conversion becomes the cumulative accretion of wisdom by negation of false options. In turn, however, this allows Christian texts, both those read and those written by the apologists, to be presented as serious philosophical literature, approachable through generic frames already familiar to Greek litterateurs.
Georg Schöllgen: Überlegungen zur christlichen Mission im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert
Lange war die Forschung sich einig, dass die aktiv betriebene Mission
zu den grundlegenden Selbstvollzügen der Kirche des 2. und 3.
Jahrhunderts gehörte und die wesentliche Ursache des Wachstums der
Kirche darstellte. Brox hat eine Reihe von Beobachtungen vorgetragen,
die erhebliche Zweifel daran rechtfertigen. Er macht darauf aufmerksam,
dass das antike Christentum keinen Terminus für Mission kannte.
Weiterhin ist es erstaunlich, dass es weder Handbücher für den Missionar
noch auf Schriften gibt, die das missionarische Wirken der Kirche zum
Gegenstand haben. Verblüffend ist ausserdem, dass Mission weithin als
eine Aufgabe der Urapostel galt, die von diesen zu Ende geführt wurde.
Zudem sind die expliziten Hinweise auf missionarisches Wirken von
Christen im 2. und 3. Jh. erstaunlich selten.
Unbestritten ist dagegen das enorme Wachstum der Gemeinden.
Der Kurzvortrag will einige Argumente für die These vorstellen, daß sich das Wachstum weniger aktiver Glaubenswerbung als der Anziehungskraft des abweichenden Verhaltens der Christen verdankt.
Unbestritten ist dagegen das enorme Wachstum der Gemeinden.
Der Kurzvortrag will einige Argumente für die These vorstellen, daß sich das Wachstum weniger aktiver Glaubenswerbung als der Anziehungskraft des abweichenden Verhaltens der Christen verdankt.
Ute Possekel: A Newly-Found Syriac Letter by Miaphysite Bishops Against the Julianists
This paper will present and interpret a previously unknown letter,
written ca. 530 by several miaphysite bishops from northern Mesopotamia
in opposition to the teachings of Julian of Halicarnassus. It is a
pastoral letter, composed in response to a request by Severus of Antioch
(ep. V.14), and addressed to the abbots and monks in the diocese
of Amida. Previously only a fragment of the letter was known, but the
full version is preserved in a manuscript owned by Harvard University
(Harvard Syriac 91), somewhat surprisingly tucked in among the polemical
treatises of Dionysius bar á¹¢alibi, the twelfth-century bishop of Amida.
The letter is also found in other manuscripts of Dionysius' polemical
treatises.
The authors of the letter were John of Tella, Sergius of Cyrus, Marion of Sura, Nonnos of Circesium, and Thomas of Dara. The letter was signed by three additional hierarchs, who presumably were not present at the time of composition but wished to endorse the letter's message. All of the signatories were part of the epistolary network of Severus of Antioch. In the letter, the miaphysite bishops lay out scriptural and theological arguments against Julian's influential doctrine of the incorruptibility of Christ's body.
The paper will present the manuscript evidence, discuss the place of the letter in the correspondence of Severus with the eastern bishops, and interpret the letter's theological arguments.
The authors of the letter were John of Tella, Sergius of Cyrus, Marion of Sura, Nonnos of Circesium, and Thomas of Dara. The letter was signed by three additional hierarchs, who presumably were not present at the time of composition but wished to endorse the letter's message. All of the signatories were part of the epistolary network of Severus of Antioch. In the letter, the miaphysite bishops lay out scriptural and theological arguments against Julian's influential doctrine of the incorruptibility of Christ's body.
The paper will present the manuscript evidence, discuss the place of the letter in the correspondence of Severus with the eastern bishops, and interpret the letter's theological arguments.
Sunday, 3 May 2015
Yuliya Minets: Languages of Christianity in Late Antiquity: Between Universalism and Cultural Superiority
The Christian thinkers of Late Antiquity felt the need to delineate
the place of Christianity within the wider world, and to define more
clearly its attitude to the Other who happened to speak in another
language. The paper focuses on the questions of the extent to which the
Christian elite groups became sensitive to the world's multilingualism,
and whether this multilingualism was regarded as a hindrance in
spreading Christianity. Being the offspring of a multilingual milieu,
from the very beginning Christianity was articulated in Aramaic, Greek,
and Latin. Unlike the Islamic tradition, Christianity rather welcomed
the translations of its sacred text (the Bible) into the local
languages. Still, there was an on-going discussion between the
representatives of two different intellectual tradition. The authors who
belonged to the first one (Augustine, John Chrysostom, Theodoret of
Cyrrhus), aspired to represent Christianity as a universal religion.
They argued that racial, ethnic, linguistic background was of no
importance for one's ability to become a Christian. The opposite
position was based on the commandment "do not throw your pearls before
swine" bolstered by the traditional supercilious attitude of the
Greco-Roman civilization towards the "barbarians". It was reflected in
hagiographical sources that described the limited ability of a barbarian
to turn into a Christian, and in the fact that the protagonists of the
numerous Christian geographical, historical, missionary narratives and
travelogues demonstrated the lack of interest in learning of and
preaching in foreign languages. The paper aims to highlight the main
points of this cultural dialogue.
Victoria Ballmes: Architecture and the Construction of Communal Memory: The Emergence of the Grand Synagogue in Late Antiquity
As Christianity became the dominant religion in the Roman Empire and
ecclesiastical authority was increasingly aligned with political power
starting in the fourth century, the accompanying shift in religious and
political power led to a change in social relations between Jews and
Christians in Late Antiquity. We see this play out in increasing
violence against Jews, in particular through the destruction and
appropriation of religious buildings and sacred space. Despite imperial
laws that forbade the building and rebuilding of synagogues, Jews
continued to construct synagogues in Late Antiquity. In fact, they
built even larger and more elaborate synagogues than ever before. It is
exactly in this time period, when synagogue construction was outlawed
and institutionalized violence against Jews and their institutions was
growing, that we see the emergency of the so-called Grand Synagogue in
Syria/Palestine and the Diaspora.
Architect Rodney Douglas Parker demonstrated in “The Architectonics of Memory” (1997) that architecture is closely linked with the human mind and how it creates memory. Architectural motifs were common in ancient rhetoric; even the oldest surviving Latin rhetoric book, the Rhetorica ad Herennium, outlines the importance of architecture in the form of loci as backgrounds in which are placed mnemonic symbols to help the orator remember. In this short communication I will argue that the construction of monumental synagogues served as a way to articulate and reinforce communal identity on the part of Jews who were facing increasing attacks and limitations on their religious practices and legal standing in the Roman Empire.
Architect Rodney Douglas Parker demonstrated in “The Architectonics of Memory” (1997) that architecture is closely linked with the human mind and how it creates memory. Architectural motifs were common in ancient rhetoric; even the oldest surviving Latin rhetoric book, the Rhetorica ad Herennium, outlines the importance of architecture in the form of loci as backgrounds in which are placed mnemonic symbols to help the orator remember. In this short communication I will argue that the construction of monumental synagogues served as a way to articulate and reinforce communal identity on the part of Jews who were facing increasing attacks and limitations on their religious practices and legal standing in the Roman Empire.
Scott Manor: Gaius or Hippolytus? Revisiting Lightfoot's hypothesis
In his essay, Caius or Hippolytus?, J.B. Lightfoot
hypothesized that these two figures may have been one in the same
person. The duplicity of personalities was the result of erroneous
assumptions on the part of Eusebius and others who know of an individual
"Gaius" primarily through the work Dialogue with Proclus the Montanist
in which a certain Gaius is cast as the main protagonist. In reality,
nearly every particular that is predicated to Gaius belongs also to
Hippolytus, thus leading Lightfoot to question the historical existence
of Gaius of Rome.
This hypothesis dissolved upon the discovery of some commentaries by Dionysius bar Salibit (d. 1171), who claims to record a dispute between Hippolytus and Gaius over the integrity of the Johannine literature. With this, Lightfoot abandoned his theory. Moreover, with this new information scholarly estimations of Gaius’ own legacy shifted drastically from viewing him as an orthodox hero to being the sole constituent of the heresy known as the Alogi, which tried to banish the Gospel and Apocalypse of John from the early church. But is this the proper way to conceive of and calibrate the evidence?
The aim of this short communication is to reconsider whether Lightfoot’s original hypothesis was indeed correct. By developing the work of some scholars who have questioned the accuracy the bar Salibi commentaries, I shall argue that the identity and existence of Gaius should once again be subsumed into that of Hippolytus.
This hypothesis dissolved upon the discovery of some commentaries by Dionysius bar Salibit (d. 1171), who claims to record a dispute between Hippolytus and Gaius over the integrity of the Johannine literature. With this, Lightfoot abandoned his theory. Moreover, with this new information scholarly estimations of Gaius’ own legacy shifted drastically from viewing him as an orthodox hero to being the sole constituent of the heresy known as the Alogi, which tried to banish the Gospel and Apocalypse of John from the early church. But is this the proper way to conceive of and calibrate the evidence?
The aim of this short communication is to reconsider whether Lightfoot’s original hypothesis was indeed correct. By developing the work of some scholars who have questioned the accuracy the bar Salibi commentaries, I shall argue that the identity and existence of Gaius should once again be subsumed into that of Hippolytus.
Nestor Kavvadas: An Apocalyptic Response to 8th Century Islamisation of Northern Mesopotamia by Joseph Hazzaya
An Apocalypse that forms the second part of an as yet uneditate tractate
"On Providence" by Joseph Hazzaya appears to be the author's response
to the rapid spread of Islam in his homeland, Northern Mesopotamia,
during the second half of the 8th century. Indeed, a close
reading of this work reveals multiple significant connections, direct or
indirect, to contemporary historical and cultural developments: from a
parallelism between the present and the reign of the Antichrist to an
exhortation urging renegates to return to the Church to - rather
unexpected - parallels between the author's accounts of para-Biblical
events and the Quran. A survey of such connections can show the
relevance of Hazzaya's Apocalypse as a piece of evidence for the history
of East Syrian Christianity in early Abbasid Northern Mesopotamia.
Mark Smith: Eutherius of Tyana and the reception of the Council of Ephesus
It is commonly assumed that the Formula of Reunion (433) marked the
formal reception of Cyril of Alexandria's council of 431. In fact, not
only did the terms of the Peace fall short of an explicit recognition of
that gathering, but a vocal and organised group of bishops continued to
resist its conciliar authority. These ‘irreconcilables' have tended to
be overlooked - seen as representing a political and doctrinal ‘dead
end', whose cause was decisively snuffed out in the wave of imperial
exiles of 434-436. In their extant writings, however, we discover a
significant and creative contribution to the articulation of ‘orthodoxy'
in the years after Ephesus - a striking ‘minority report' that
associated true fidelity to the Nicene faith with the rejection, rather
than the acceptance, of Cyril's council. The paper will examine the
contribution of one of these men - Eutherius of Tyana - to this
alternative ‘idea of Nicaea'. It will note especially: (1) Eutherius'
development of Nestorius' arguments against Cyril's interpretation of
the Nicene Creed; (2) Eutherius' use of Cyril's conciliar documentation
to undermine Cyril's own account of his council; (3) Eutherius'
alternative narrative of Nicene orthodoxy, in which the Nicene faith was
preserved and passed on not via the great conciliar consensus of
Ephesus I, but rather via a faithful remnant who stood firm, contra
mundum. In these ways, we are alerted to the remarkable flexibility of
discourse concerning ‘orthodoxy' in this crucial decade.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)