According to the common opinion today, the works written and/or
preserved under the name of Gregory of Nyssa might be divided in two
main classes: treatises and homilies. The first ones are commonly censed
as having a doctrinal clue: despite their occasional character has
been the author (or may be by his editors) gave them a theoretical
structure, so that they were subtracted to the circumstantial boundaries
of their own composition, thus, becoming a well-definite corpus of
theological works. The second group of works has perhaps the same origin
of the first ones, but create a different story. Homilies were born in
the activity of preaching, whereas the theoretical works have become
treatises. Homilies are many-facetted texts ranging over multifarious
topics.
Informed by Plutarch of Chaeronea, I read Gregory especially as a performer, a speaker, not only in his homiletic texts. His works were somehow two-step texts. For, first, they were held as lectures or conferences, and then fixed and revised in order to explicate — or to polish — the logical and rhetorical architecture. If it is so, then Gregory is to be considered a homilist, an oral philosopher, whose prevalent activity is talking before his audience rather than writing in the lonely frame of a monastic cell.
Informed by Plutarch of Chaeronea, I read Gregory especially as a performer, a speaker, not only in his homiletic texts. His works were somehow two-step texts. For, first, they were held as lectures or conferences, and then fixed and revised in order to explicate — or to polish — the logical and rhetorical architecture. If it is so, then Gregory is to be considered a homilist, an oral philosopher, whose prevalent activity is talking before his audience rather than writing in the lonely frame of a monastic cell.
No comments:
Post a Comment