Cyril's "science of Christ" is located at the very core of the
Christian intellectual tradition, yet we apparently no longer understand
its most basic philosophical premises. This presentation deals with the
metaphysical tenets of Cyril's "science of Christ." It contextualizes
Cyril's thought within the limits of the intellectual horizons of 5th
century Alexandria, locating the basis of his theological speculations
in the commentaries on Plato's Parmenides and focusing particularly on
the creative input of Iamblichus and Syrianus. It then applies the
schema of theological analysis offered by these to Cyril's metaphysics
of the Incarnation, hypothesizing what will follow if we assume that it
underlines his conceptions and functions as a paradigm for his "science
of Christ." It will consequently conclude that Cyril's master agenda can
be thought of as a brilliant synthesis of the exegesis of the
Christological vision of the Fourth Gospel with the terms of the
metaphysics of the Parmenides as mediated via the late Platonist
commentators.
The presentation mainly focuses on Cyril's mereological thought. Special emphasis is given to the conflict of properties in Christ. The application of the correct "term" of understanding in each case is offered as the resolution of an apparent paradox, rescuing the affirmations from self-contradiction through the utility of the notions of pros heauto and pros ta alla. Finally, the presentation aims to show how this approach to the subject matter relates to the diverging patterns of understanding of Cyril's metaphysics: i.e. to the macro-argumentative strategy of ancient and modern interpreters.
The presentation mainly focuses on Cyril's mereological thought. Special emphasis is given to the conflict of properties in Christ. The application of the correct "term" of understanding in each case is offered as the resolution of an apparent paradox, rescuing the affirmations from self-contradiction through the utility of the notions of pros heauto and pros ta alla. Finally, the presentation aims to show how this approach to the subject matter relates to the diverging patterns of understanding of Cyril's metaphysics: i.e. to the macro-argumentative strategy of ancient and modern interpreters.
No comments:
Post a Comment