In "Christian Philosophy", which is the term by which the Christian
author themselves describe their way of thinking from the 4th century
onwards, we can discern a certain tendency which reached its final and
massive breakthrough with the Cappadocian Fathers. This tendency
consisted in circumscribing the divine essence, which according to
Neoplatonism and negative theology is unknowable for theoretical reason,
by increasingly making use of ethical categories. We find a first
indication of this already in the circle of Gregory of Nyssa (Ps-Gregor,
De creatione hominis) where the answer to the question what
Christianity is has ethical implications: Homoiosis Theo. The clearest
example of this tendency is then provided by Gregory of Nyssa himself
who quite often calls God the aretē pantelēs. This, however, is possible
only if the sense of the word aretē is uniform, i.e. the meaning of
moral expressions is the same when applied to God and to man - an idea
that was already formulated by Origen and Gregory Thaumatourgos in the
wake of the Stoics. According to this notion, which is present in Origen
and the Cappadocian Fathers, man is able to come closer to God by a
practical knowledge of himself as it is mentioned in the commentaries to
the Song of Songs. In this way for the Cappadocian Fathers subsequent
to Origen, the way to God seems to be blocked for theoretical reason.
Practical reason, however, does open a new way here.
No comments:
Post a Comment