This paper considers Roman florilegia on the Spirit that date from
the very start of the conflict between East and West regarding the
Spirit’s procession. Codex Parisinus graecus 1115 is a copy of a codex
that was created in the papal chancery in 774/5. The patristic
quotations of the extant florilegium on the Spirit within this codex are
of a broad order; while many of them affirm a procession through the Son, some of them speak of a procession from
the Son, while others do not mention the procession at all. Alexander
Alexakis has shown that this is a pro-Latin collection, albeit from a
very early date in the conflict. Alexakis has also shown that there are
textual overlaps between this collection and Adrian I’s Hadrianum (793). In Hadrianum,
Adrian argues explicitly for the procession through the Son, and does
so from a very mixed range of quotations, even using citations that
affirm the procession from the Son. This paper uses these multifaceted
collections to throw light on Pope Theodore’s I now lost florilegium (c.
643), which is attested by Maximus the Confessor in Opusculum
10. The textual links between the three collections are considered, and
their theological character investigated. It is demonstrated that these
florilegia shared similar purposes, which reflect Rome’s position at a
time before it accepted the interpolated creed. It is finally suggested
that the strategy of considering these collections together offers a
more secure route to reconstructing Theodore’s florilegium than
approaches based purely on theological conjecture.
No comments:
Post a Comment