Political rhetoric and moral psychology converge in the study of
Ambrose's imperial funerary speeches. Although his interpretation of
Psalm 61 contains similar, pointed reflections on the western emperor
Gratian's demise, and thus constitutes Ambrose's first effort at
commemorating a dead emperor, no funeral was allowed to Gratian,
Ambrose's remarks were not put into the form of a funerary speech, and
scholars have therefore neglected to study them in that context. This
paper makes good the deficit by interpreting those remarks in the
context of Ambrose's funerary rhetoric. The bishop imposes a powerful
scriptural narrative on the events surrounding the emperor's death: like
Christ, Ambrose's Gratian undergoes betrayal and substitutionary death
at the hands of a diabolical triad of persecutors (Judas, Pilate,
Herod). Gratian's flight and subsequent resignation to his impending
death are not haplessness, but pious nobility and utter reliance on God;
his is a soul is properly disposed and therefore a model to other
souls, whether private or imperial. The commemoration of Gratian
therefore not only presages rhetorical strategies in Ambrose's later
efforts at imperial funerary speaking, it also seeks to forge an
affective bond between subjects and an emperor subject to God, as well
as to sketch out the virtuous disposition of the imperial soul. In so
doing, Ambrose's commemoration of Gratian constitutes an important
moment in the unfolding articulation of Ambrose's scriptural politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment