The teaching of Gregory of Nyssa on the Trinity has been explored in
the light of late antique logic by a number of recent authors, notably
Johannes Zachhuber in Human Nature in Gregory of Nyssa (De Gruyter 2000)
and in his subsequent exchange of articles with Richard Cross. The
evolution of Aristotelian logic in late antiquity has also been the
subject of perceptive and innovative works by scholars such as Ricardo
Chiaradonna, Sten Ebbesen and Steven Strange. Most of these studies have
been undertaken without reference to theology; the present paper will
consider whether the difficulties of Gregory’s argument could be
tempered, not so much by the direct application of ancient logical
theories, as by reflection on what the theorists have to say about the
nature and purpose of Aristotelian logic.
A secondary goal of the paper will be to reconcile the simile of the rainbow in [Basil], Letter 38 with the meteorological phenomena, making use of other ancient writings on the same topic and of modern work on ancient perceptions of
A secondary goal of the paper will be to reconcile the simile of the rainbow in [Basil], Letter 38 with the meteorological phenomena, making use of other ancient writings on the same topic and of modern work on ancient perceptions of
No comments:
Post a Comment