The paper explores the convention of referring to Augustine's Confessions
as ‘a protreptic' and how this may enhance or impair understanding of
this work. It examines the problematic nature of definitions of
protreptic as well as the intersection of what is normally identified as
protreptic with what is usually defined as paraenetic and apologetic
aims. Some parallels with extended first-person narration in Plato's Apology of Socrates and Seventh Letter and Isocrates' Antidosis
are pointed out before the focus moves back to the intersection of
protreptic, paraenetic and apologetic communicative purposes and
autobiographical narration in the Confessions.
No comments:
Post a Comment