Although “allegory” and “typology” are commonplace in discussions of
patristic interpretation, Irenaeus’s use of these words may seem unusual
and even contradictory. Scholars have claimed that Irenaeus eschews
allegory, but then ends up using it in his own interpretation. I will
argue that Irenaeus’s use of “allegory” and “typology” is in fact quite
consistent. To do this, I will divide my discussion into two sections.
First, I will examine those parts of the Adversus Haereses where Irenaeus discusses allegory specifically. Second, I will examine those places in the Adversus Haereses where Irenaeus uses the term typus.
Irenaeus never offers us a formal definition of either allegory or
typology, but he does not see allegory as compatible with reading the
Scriptures according to the rule of faith. He does, however, think that
reading the Scriptures with the rule of faith will enable readers to see
types that foreshadow Christ.
No comments:
Post a Comment