Although the debate of the authenticity of the letters attributed to
the desert fathers is one of the most important issues related to the
recent research on early monasticism, an important part of these texts,
the so-called ‘Macarian letters' have only occasionally caught some
scholarly attention. This paper examines the most important piece of the
corpus, the first letter usually cited as ‘Ad filios Dei'. In the first
part of my paper I present a philologico-critical analysis of the
different recensions of the letter with particular emphasis on the
Greek, Coptic and Syriac versions, and then I turn to survey the central
theological and ascetical motifs of the text (the role of the Holy
Spirit in ascetic life, self-knowledge, and the ‘play of the divine
grace') and examine their possible relationship with monastic literature
in the context of the letters of Antony and Ammonas. With the help of
this duplex investigation I try to make a decision about the question of
authenticity in stricter and in a more general sense as well: ‘Is it
possible that Macarius the Great himself was the author of the letter or
not?' or ‘whether the Ad filios Dei be a credible witness of 4th
century monasticism, or it is just a later pseudonym compilation?'
No comments:
Post a Comment