Contemporary suspicion abounds against thinkers from the classical
through the early modern period who draw on supposed metaphysical
notions of impersonal and ahistorical substance to frame, and in the
minds of critics undermine, discussions of God and the human being.
Careful examinations into the actual use of substance from the classical
through the early modern period can tell a different story, which is
epitomized in Augustine and Luther’s exegesis of Psalm 68/9. In the
midst of his treatment of this Psalm, Augustine takes up the received
philosophical notion of substance and critically reinterprets it within a
trinitarian and christological framework. For Augustine, substance is
imbued with a twofold—creative and soteriological—receptive dynamic
toward God that is fulfilled within the loving movement of human praise
toward God. Working within this Augustinian reading, Luther also
rejects what he terms the philosophical approach to substance in favor
of a christological reading that extends and expands on aspects of
Augustine’s account of the relational and dynamic nature of substance.
Here Luther moves the concept of substance more explicitly from a
metaphysical to an existential context, arguing that substance refers to
the qualities of human life rather than to what constitutes the basis
of life. Luther also more explicitly draws out the manner in which the
historical and soteriological space of human existence defines the
nature of human substance, harkening closer to Heidegger’s being-in than
to the temporally flat, ahistorical notions of substance the
Augustinian tradition is often accused of incorporating into its
anthropology.
No comments:
Post a Comment