Cassian's subtle use of Evagrius' Origenism has been studied with particular attention to puritas cordis and apatheia;
the general conclusion is that Cassian was able to translate earlier
Greek discussions into a theology that was palatable to Latin ears
piqued to hear heretical notions of sinless-ness. This paper will
investigate whether Cassian was able to do something similar with the
notion of apokatastasis. If Cassian had assumed the eventual
restoration of all things under Christ (as reflected in Origen,
Evagrius, and Gregory of Nyssa), we have a new perspective from which to
judge the later (mis-)understanding of Cassian's theology of grace
sparked by Prosper's contra Coll. as this paper will argue.
Careful study of Cassian's discussions of Heaven and Hell reveal that
Cassian's theology of grace does not fit within Augustine's eschatology,
as Prosper had attempted to understand the two 5th century theologians.
Rather, we should be attentive to Cassian's own eschatology when we
study his theology of grace.
No comments:
Post a Comment