Ever since Eusebius, Stromateis 1.1.11 has been read as the
principal primary source for Clement of Alexandria's biography. This
has lent it prominence in discussion of Clement's work, since scholarly
interpretation regularly organises meaning through a historical,
biographical lens. But the well-known passage discloses precious
little: vague and allusive, it seems designed to frustrate enquiry,
though scholars have often sought to supply the details that Clement
hides. This short communication will argue that his primary purpose in this passage is to develop a paradigm for how readers should engage with the Stromateis
by taking the author as their model. Clement's account of his journey
to acquire wisdom, while probably historically accurate, is elusively
presented because its intention is symbolic. Drawing on tropes that
were widespread in Greek and Roman literature and partly paralleled in
Jewish and Christian discourse, Clement articulates how the reader
should travel through the Stromateis both at a literary level
(encountering much transmediterranean wisdom but ultimately resting in
browsing the apostolic meadow in Egypt) and at a metaliterary level
(where the mind travels in quest of understanding, which the whole
person puts to use in treading the ‘ways' of wisdom).
This shift in emphasis from author to author-reader relationship affects our reading of the Stromateis as a whole, encouraging greater attentiveness to the pedagogical, theological and historical significance of Clement's use of literary form.
This shift in emphasis from author to author-reader relationship affects our reading of the Stromateis as a whole, encouraging greater attentiveness to the pedagogical, theological and historical significance of Clement's use of literary form.
No comments:
Post a Comment