It is a well-known fact that during the Byzantine period some of the
works of the most prominent Church Fathers, such as Basil the Great,
Gregory of Nazianzus, Gregory of Nyssa and John the Chrysostom, were
meticulously read and copied time and again. More than that, they were
also regarded as exemplars in their respective literary genre or
sub-genre (e.g. epistolography, epideictic oratory etc.) and as such
they were expectedly meant to be imitated in terms of style, eloquence
and language. From this angle twelfth-century Constantinople does not
constitute a breach in a well-established and centuries-old practice.
Nevertheless, there is an aspect of intellectual activity during this
period, which has not yet received the attention it merits, namely the
impact or influence of patristic literature on the educational process. A
vigorous interest was indeed demonstrated by the repeated use of
patristic texts in the classroom. One vivid example would be the
commentary of Niketas of Heracleia (late 11th/early 12th century) on
sixteen orations of Gregory Nazianzenus, which soon after its
composition entered the school curriculum. Moreover, the aforementioned
Fathers’ works, as well as various encomia, lives, passions and miracles
of other early Church Fathers and saints (e.g. Nicholas and Spyridon), Apophthegmata Patrum and Narrationes animae utiles,
were a vast pool from which extracts could be drawn so as to be used
for the teaching of grammar with the innovative technique of schedography (i.e. the composition of short grammatical pieces).
No comments:
Post a Comment