For 70 years, scholars of Maximus the Confessor have repeatedly
called for a closer investigation of the influence of Dionysius the
Areopagite on Maximus the Confessor's thought. Much work has been done
and is being done on the subject of participation, which is of crucial
importance for both Maximus and Dionysius, although scholars have also
disputed its importance for the Confessor. By exploring the role
analogical thought plays in his system, we can better assess the
importance of the concept of participation for Maximus. Participation
means the downward movement of the Creator, who is imparting the gift of
being to creatures, while analogy leads the rational creature back up
to the origin of being in virtue of the similitude of all things with
the Word of God. In the end, the revelatory aspect of creation itself
rests on its analogy to God the Word, so that every logos a particular
being possesses, expresses in some form the fullness of the Word of God,
through whom all things were made. This paradox of total divine
presence in finite creatures constitutes a crucial point of reference
for Maximus's synthesis of the Patristic tradition, particularly the
thought of Dionysius. This can be shown from the collection of the
Ambigua as a whole, in particular his famous Ambigua 7 and 10, but also
from the lesser known Ambiguum 35 and other texts. Disregarding this
paradox of divine presence would have implications for any account of
Maximian ontology, exegesis, anthropology and theology.
No comments:
Post a Comment