This paper will follow upon the paper I presented at the conference
in 2011: "Eustathius of Antioch on Jesus' Digestion." There I discussed a
fragment from Eustathius of Antioch's Contra Ariomanitas in
which Eustathius deployed an Aristotelian physiological scheme involving
the digestive tract to argue for the existence of a human soul in
Christ as the subject of the human emotions and changes therein recorded
in the gospels. This paper will investigate a claim made in the
anti-Apollinarian section of Epiphanius's Panarion 77:
that while having a complete human digestive system, Christ never used
it to excrete solid waste. According to Epiphanius, some Apollinarians
reasoned that if Christ had a flesh like that of ordinary human beings,
he must have excreted like them. Since this is an unacceptable
conclusion, Christ's flesh must therefore have been different from
normal human flesh. Epiphanius combats the implicit Docetism of this
claim while simultaneously confirming his opponents' denial that Christ
excreted solid waste. In this paper I will consider whether this
discussion in Epiphanius bears any relation to the Eustathian claim that
Christ had a normal digestive system; how this claim became implicated
in the anti-Apollinarian debate (likely resulting from speculation about
the consubstantiality of Christ's humanity with his divinity); and the
background to one argument Epiphanius makes in support of his claim that
Christ did not defecate: rabbinic commentary on Deut. 23:13-14, that
during the Exodus, the Israelites did not excrete the manna God
miraculously sent to nourish them.
No comments:
Post a Comment