Ammianus recounts two specific episodes to illustrate the characater
of C. Ceionius Rufius Volusianus signo Lampadius, praefectus urbi at
Rome in 365/6 (27.3.5-8), whom he presents as vain and pompous, though
he occasionally showed himself "severus et frugi." The second episode
presents no problems of interpretationl: during Lampadius' prefecture
there were frequent riots, in one of which the lowest classes of the
city almost succeeded in burning down one of his town-houses, provoked
by his illicit seizure of metals for in use his buidling and restoration
projects. The first episode, however, has been seriously misdated and
hence probably misinterpreted by the consensus of scholarship. Ammianus
introduces it with the clause "hic cum magnificos praetor ederet ludos
et uberrime largiretur." This has so far always been construed as "when
this man was gving magnificent games as praetor etc.," so that the
episode has always been dated three decades before Lampadius' urban
prefecture. I shall demonstrate on both philological and historical
grounds that Ammianus refers to the games put on by the praetor of 366,
which provoked the jealousy of Lampadius when he was in office as
praefectus urbi. In the light of this newly established context, I shall
consider who are most likely to be the beggars whom Lampadius summoned
from the Vatican and to whom he gave lavish gifts ("accitos a Vaticano
quosdam egentes opibus ditaverat magnis").
No comments:
Post a Comment