This paper is part of the accepted workshop "Christianity and
Medicine, Health, and Disability: Virginity's Anatomy." This paper will
consider attitudes towards virginity tests in three works not generally
juxtaposed: the Protevangelium of James, the Mishnah, and an anonymous
Syriac verse homily. I will argue that the Protevangelium and the
Mishnah, despite coming from different communities and representing very
distinct literary genres, both reflect an emphasis on physical markers
as the most significant "evidence" of female virginity, even as they
both reveal an awareness of and even perhaps anxiety about other
possible signs of virginity. By contrast, the late antique Syriac
homily, though clearly based on and reworking the narratives of the
Protevangelium, in fact subverts the emphasis on physical virginity in
the earlier works and instead preferences non-anatomical markers of
female virginity. Various possibilities for explaining this shift and
appreciating its significance will be considered.
No comments:
Post a Comment