Eusebius preserves the claim, derived from an
unknown author of the third century, that Galen was “worshipped” by the
Theodotians, a group of Roman Christians with serious intellectual pretensions
(HE 5.28.14). This paper disputes two
common points made in previous interpretations of the passage. First, there is
no reason to believe that Galen had any personal connection with the
Theodotians, much less that he played a significant role in the development of
their program of study, as has been claimed. Galen, the paper demonstrates, had
no patience for amateur scholars from non-elite backgrounds, and he would thus
have had nothing to do with the banausic Theodotians, whose founder was a
leather-worker by profession. Second, and notwithstanding the paper’s first
argument, the claim that the Theodotians worshipped Galen is a probable sign of
their interest in medical subjects, contrary to suggestions that they were only
interested in the Pergamene physician’s works on logic and philosophy. The
Theodotians, the paper argues, had good reason to be interested in the research
of Galen and other doctors, particularly in the area of embryology. For the
Theodotians were proponents of an Adoptionist Christology, and thus concerned
themselves with the circumstances of Jesus’ birth, and his development in the
womb. To illustrate this possible link between Adoptionism and Embryology, the
paper points to some similarities between Galen’s De Foetuum Formatione and the account of the Theodotians’
Adoptionist position in the Refutatio of pseudo-Hippolytus.
No comments:
Post a Comment