The genealogy of Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ,
preoccupied Christian writers from an early date, especially in response to
Jewish and pagan questioning of her personal status and virtue. This was a Christological
issue since it concerned the background of Jesus Christ, who took on his
mother’s human nature in the incarnation. The problem was complicated by the
fact that the genealogies that appear in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke deal
only with the lineage of Joseph; that of the Virgin Mary could only be inferred
on the basis that, according to Jewish marriage law, she must have belonged to
the same tribe as Joseph. Eusebius of Caesarea suggested this solution in his History
of the Church and influenced later exegetes including the eighth-century
Byzantine preacher, Andrew of Crete. Nevertheless, some polemical, doctrinal,
and hagiographical texts, dating roughly from the seventh through ninth
centuries, began to propose genealogies for the Virgin Mary herself. It is
likely that such speculation (the sources of which remain obscure) arose in
response both to new questioning of Mary’s legitimacy from Jewish critics and
to her growing importance in Byzantine ritual and devotion. Another interesting
aspect of this process is the idea, attested in some texts, that the Virgin was
descended from both royal and priestly tribes of Israel. Genealogies, which
served to place both Christ and his mother, Mary, within the history and
fulfilment of God’s dispensation for salvation, thus remained as significant
within the Byzantine theological tradition as they had been for the evangelists
and their audiences. Focus on the Virgin Mary’s own genealogy reflected her
growing prominence in the cultural and religious life of the Middle Byzantine
period.
No comments:
Post a Comment